Christmas brings many traditions back that we see companies
take part in annually, and Starbucks Red Cups are one of these. As part of the
launch of these iconic red cups making an appearance again, the popular coffee
shop chain Starbucks created a four-metre high installation made to look like a
Christmas tree, created from Starbucks red cups.
The installation was erected in Kings Cross’s train station
in London and required customers to tweet in with the hashtag #RedCups and
share their red cup moments with pictures. This idea of sharing images and
tweets on twitter and Instagram was linked to their social campaign where they
wanted customers to tweet their experiences throughout the Christmas period.
With each time the hashtag being displayed a limited edition emoji of a Red Cup
would appear.
This campaign in London aim was to involve their customers
passing by asking them to tweet with #RedCups and the more tweets that were
submitted the more the Christmas tree lit up. This campaign is an example of
Sensory Marketing as Starbucks were promoting their festive drinks over the
Christmas period, by using the human senses to market their product.
Vision, the four metre high installation was used to attract
the attention of consumers. The installation was situated in the middle of a
busy London train station and is hard to miss by all commuters passing by. Consumers
that were attracted over and took part in these campaign were presented with a
gift card from Starbucks to use over the Christmas period, as a way of thanking
their customers. As well vision, smell is another sense used. The installation
was designed to smell like Starbuck’s product, the Gingerbread Latte, which is
a limited edition drink at this season and is a popular drink for this company.
This smell is something that is aimed to stay in the thoughts of the consumer
in hope that they remember about this product later in the day, potentially
whilst passing a Starbucks, resulting them in buying a product.
Red cups leading up to Christmas gets me so excited
ReplyDelete